
成果範例
標準版方案範例
Process review: order-to-delivery at a custom furniture workshop
Current process map (order intake → production)
- Customer sends an inquiry via website form, phone or Instagram DM
- Owner (Dan) replies personally, often 1–3 days later
- Dan measures on site, sketches by hand, photographs the sketch
- Quote typed in a Word template, emailed as PDF
- Customer pays 50% deposit by bank transfer; Dan checks the bank app manually
- Sketch and notes handed to the shop lead on paper
- Shop lead orders wood by phone; adds job to the whiteboard
Bottlenecks and losses
| Problem | Where | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| All inquiries go through one person | Steps 1–2 | ~20% of inquiries never get a reply; slow first response |
| Paper handoff to the shop | Step 6 | 3 rework cases last quarter due to lost or misread dimensions |
| Deposit checked by hand | Step 5 | Jobs start late; once a job started without a deposit |
| Whiteboard is the only schedule | Step 7 | Delivery dates promised without seeing the load |
Improved process
- All channels lead to one shared inbox; office manager replies within 4 working hours with a booking link for measurement
- Measurements entered into a job card (shared spreadsheet or simple CRM): dimensions, wood, finish, photos
- Quote generated from a price sheet with standard options; Dan approves only non-standard items
- Office manager confirms the deposit and marks the job card "Ready for production"
- Shop lead takes jobs only from the "Ready" column; materials ordered from the card
- Delivery date given only after the job is placed on the shared schedule
Simple metrics to track
- First response time — target: under 4 working hours
- Inquiry → paid deposit conversion — current estimate 25%, target 35%
- Rework cases per month — target: 0–1
- On-time delivery — target: 90%
Step-by-step plan
- Week 1: set up a shared inbox and a job card template
- Week 2: build a price sheet with the 12 most common options
- Week 3: move the whiteboard to a shared schedule; train the shop lead
- Week 4: review the first 10 orders against the new metrics
Client: Oak & Pine Studio, a 9-person workshop making custom tables and shelving. Processes reviewed: order intake, production scheduling, delivery and installation.
客戶與所有細節皆為虛構。
關於此服務
代理商最容易在簽約之後到第一個成果之前流失客戶的好感:客戶重複填寫冗長的需求說明、苦等帳號權限共享,也沒人告訴他們前兩週會發生什麼事。我們描繪從簽約到啟動會議與首次交付的路徑:業務交接、需求說明、權限申請、啟動會議、首批交付成果與第一份報告。您會得到清楚的導入順序,包含負責人與期限、面向客戶的歡迎計畫,以及啟動所需天數等可追蹤的數字。
包含內容
- 您將獲得一份書面檢視報告:從簽約到首次交付、含角色的導入步驟、延誤與重複提問的表格、改善後的順序、歡迎計畫大綱、指標與調整計畫。
- 業務到團隊的交接啟動前團隊必須掌握的資訊
- 需求說明只問一次消除重複的提問與表單
- 權限與素材檢核表向客戶索取什麼、何時索取
- 前兩週計畫客戶會看到與聽到您哪些溝通
- 導入指標啟動所需天數、首次交付所需天數
服務流程
- 1需求說明您描述目前新客戶如何開始
- 2檢視我們找出等待與重複的要求
- 3計畫您取得新的導入順序
需要您提供的資料
貴代理商的業務內容、交易如何從業務交接給團隊、一開始向客戶索取什麼、目前從簽約到開工需要多久、客戶早期抱怨什麼,以及需求說明或專案看板的截圖。
我們會詢問您:
- 貴公司是哪一類代理商?
- 客戶簽約後馬上發生什麼事?
- 從簽約到真正開工需要幾天?
- 您使用哪些工具進行專案與客戶溝通?
比較方案
付款保障
下單時付款,但只有在驗收成果後,款項才會撥付。
- 固定價格付款後,方案價格不會變動。
- 款項先行保留付款時,金額只會先保留,在您驗收後才會撥付給服務。
- 交付前檢查每份成果在交到您手上之前都會經過品質檢查,您也可以在驗收前於訂單頁面查看成果。
- 免費修改在需求說明範圍內,可依方案允許的次數提出修改。
- 3 天後自動驗收若您在交付後 3 天內未驗收也未提出修改,成果將自動驗收。若您在交付後於訂單聊天室留言,訂單會暫停自動驗收;我們回覆後,可能會重新起算 3 天,並會在聊天室中告知。
- 重新製作或全額退款若成果不符合您的需求說明且修改後仍未改善,或製作時間超過交付期限的兩倍,請在訂單聊天室留言:我們將重新製作,或全額退還款項。
常見問題
你們會撰寫歡迎郵件和需求說明表單嗎?
檢視報告會概述內容應包含什麼、何時寄送。完整文案需另外下單。
你們可以看我們的專案管理工具嗎?
我們不會登入您的工具。請改為提供看板與範本的截圖。
這也涉及合約嗎?
不涉及。我們檢視的是簽約之後的工作流程,而不是合約條款。
沒有找到您要的答案?